iSixSigma Homepage
Blogosphere Homepage
iSixSigma Live!
iSixSigma Publications

Free Weekly Newsletter


Your Privacy Matters
Newsletter Archives



BLOGGERS
 
Gary P. Cox [92]  RSS  Gary P. Cox's Biography
Gianna Clark [87]  RSS  Gianna Clark's Biography
Michael Cyger [77]  RSS  Michael Cyger's Biography
Sue Kozlowski [63]  RSS  Sue Kozlowski's Biography
Robin Barnwell [49]  RSS  Robin Barnwell's Biography
Andrew Downard [34]  RSS  Andrew Downard's Biography
Stephen C. Crate [20]  RSS  Stephen C. Crate's Biography
Sven Saerens [19]  RSS  Sven Saerens's Biography
Holly Hawkins [19]  RSS  Holly Hawkins's Biography
Charles McKinney [14]  RSS  Charles McKinney's Biography
Laura Gibbons [13]  RSS  Laura Gibbons's Biography
Capt. Harris [12]  RSS  Capt. Harris's Biography
J P Spencer [12]  RSS  J P Spencer's Biography
Vincent Chin [9]  RSS  Vincent Chin's Biography
James Considine [9]  RSS  James Considine's Biography
Zakir Ahamed [3]  RSS  Zakir Ahamed's Biography


CATEGORIES
 
Book Review [3]  RSS
Buzz/Press [57]  RSS
Conferences [59]  RSS
General [294]  RSS
Government [18]  RSS
Guest Blog [12]  RSS
History [10]  RSS
Innovation [16]  RSS
Leadership [140]  RSS
Lean [21]  RSS
Management [153]  RSS
Methodology [148]  RSS
Podcasts [8]  RSS
Research [20]  RSS
The Cox-Box [91]  RSS


RECENT ENTRIES RSS
 
Innovation and Six Sigma by Andrew Downard
Six Sigma - IAGTM by Gianna Clark
iSixSigma Live Seattle by Michael Cyger
Six Sigma Hat by Gary P. Cox
The Consultant Within by Andrew Downard
More Henry Ford by Stephen C. Crate


LATEST COMMENTS
 
iSixSigma Live Seattle
by : Stephen C. Crate
iSixSigma Live Seattle
by : Meikah Delid
iSixSigma Live Seattle
by : K. North-Miller
The Consultant Within
by : Andrew Downard
 


CTQ MEDIA BLOGS
 
Sourcingmag Blogosphere

BPM Enterprise Blogosphere

RealInnovation Commentary
 


SIX SIGMA BLOGS
 
Today's Six Sigma

Lean Six Sigma Academy

Leadership & Business

Six Sigma for Corporate Real Estate

Keith Bower Podcasts
 


LEAN BLOGS
 
Lean Blog

Got Boondoggle?

Evolving Excellence

Reforming Project Management

Learning About Lean
 


BUSINESS BLOGS
 
shmula

Seth Godin's Blog

Decker Marketing

Guy Kawasaki

Fast Company Now
 


BLOG ARCHIVE RSS
 



RETIRED BLOGGERS
 
Kosta Chingas

Gary Cone

Brian Costello

Andrew Hillig

Rick Maher

Lisa Moore
 


SigmaXL V5.1 Excel Add-In
Six Sigma Statistics & Graphics. Ideal for training. Now compatible with Excel 2007. Free Trial.
www.SigmaXL.com
 
Voice of the Customer
AMS can help you find out what your customers really want!
www.ams-inc.com
 
6s & Small Co's
How one company went from 2 to 201 employees in 3 years, and why they now use 6s. Exclusively in iSixSigma Magazine!
www.isixsigma-magazine.com
 
6s Projects and Presentations
Immediately purchase and download Six Sigma project examples, research and training tools.
store.isixsigma.com
 
6s Recruiting
We can help you staff your org, in weeks! Call us at 847-919-0922 x8857 to get started.
jobs.isixsigma.com/
 

12 March 2008 by Sue Kozlowski
Printable version  |  Email to a friend

Achieving Lean

There's a great quote from Shakespeare's "Twelfth Night" that I was thinking of today, in relation to how we teach lean. The character Malvolio says, "Be not afraid of greatness. Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon 'em."

So, with apologies to Will...

"Some are born lean, some achieve lean, and some have lean thrust upon 'em."

When our organization started to explore lean methods, we were informed that we would learn by doing. No classes! (That sure felt like having lean "thrust upon us" at the time.) The Toyota way is to teach lean as an integral part of the job, as the tasks are learned. In our situation, since we weren't "born lean," our sensei taught us tools and concepts throughout the first Rapid Improvement Event. When we asked how we could learn to lead events ourselves, we were told that we would have to do hundreds of events before we could consider ourselves to be senseis.

Well, I confess - we didn't listen. We incorporated lean concepts and tools into our classes and taught our leaders lean right along with Six Sigma. We even renamed our Green Belts as Lean Green Belts. We started running our own events and had many successes - some failures, but with overall effectiveness.

So although we weren't born lean, we seem to have figured out how to work toward achieving lean.

The question that I'm pondering is, how do other organizations approach this issue? Do you teach lean concepts and tools to your employees in a classroom setting? Or do you espouse the "learn-by-doing" philosophy? I'm interested to find out what has worked for you.

Save, Share & Recommend This Blog
Digg It Digg It Del.icio.us Del.icio.us Reddit Reddit Google Google

Yahoo! Yahoo

StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
Leadership , Lean , Management
posted by Sue Kozlowski  at  7:18 PM ET | comments [8]


BLOG COMMENT

posted by  Pete Abilla  [ http://www.shmula.com ] 12 March 2008 at 8:21 PM ET
Learn-by-Doing is, in my view, about 90% of how the teaching happens, from my experience. There is some classroom training, but the classroom is the Gemba, not a literal classroom that is geographically distant from where the work happens.

One more thing: the term "Lean Green Belts" is strange. I don't mean to be splitting hairs, but that title just feels funny to me. I can't articulate it, but it just seems phony; very popular culture, with not much substance.

What do you think?
 


posted by  Ron Pereira  [ http://lssacademy.com ] 13 March 2008 at 4:11 AM ET
In my opinion, lean is learned best in a kaizen environment.

In other words, if you need to reduce changeover time you pull a team together and run through a SMED training module for a few hours. Then you go do it.

There is no need for lego simulations or paper airplanes. Get out of the classroom and onto the shop floor (or office) and make something happen.

I tend to agree with Pete on the naming convention... but do what works best with your company culture.
 


posted by  James Considine 13 March 2008 at 8:08 AM ET
Sounds like your sensei is interested in preserving the mystique of his title - hundreds of events? Please.

I think the learn by doing as far as lean goes can be especially powerful. I also think not labeling things is the way to go. That way people are thinking about ways to solve problems, not "should I do lean, should I do six sigma, should I do both, PDCA, Kaizen, etc...."
 


posted by  Sue Kozlowski 13 March 2008 at 11:59 AM ET
But gee, lego simulations are so much fun!

I'm hearing consensus among you that "learn by doing" is best, but, how long does it take to filter that throughout your entire company? We have about 17,000 employees, and 800 leaders. Even though we can do multiple events in different value streams, it's still going to take a LONG time to get to everyone. How do you handle that issue?

For the title Lean Green Belt, we were trying for a name that combined both Lean and Six Sigma, building on the past instead of seeming like it was a new "flavor of the month." If we had started with lean first, I'm sure we would not be using the belt designations at all!

Thanks Pete, Ron, and James for sharing your insights.
 


posted by  Ron Pereira  [ http://lssacademy.com ] 14 March 2008 at 8:22 AM ET
Hi Sue,

This is tough. You may need to lean (no pun intended) on some GOOD consultants to help get things off the ground.

Might I recommend Gemba Research (gemba.com). They are dang good and are not interested in dragging things out in order to keep getting paid like some consultants out there.

Remember... it took Toyota 50 years to get where they are. It will take time to do this properly.

But if you focus on big bang training in hotel conference rooms I predict mediocre results at best.

Email me if you want to take this offline and discuss in more detail (info at leansixsigmaacademy dot com).

Best,
Ron


 


posted by  Sue Kozlowski 15 March 2008 at 9:39 AM ET
Thanks for your comment, Ron. I have no way to know whether, at Toyota, you would need to facilitate a certain number of Rapid Improvement Events to become a sensei. As a matter of fact, I have a high regard for the sensei who first taught us lean. I do think it's tough when a consultant has to accomplish two objectives, facilitate the event per the contract, AND act as a sales agent for the consulting company!

We are now operating pretty independently (all training & event faciltiing in-house), and we're using both methods - some classroom training, some just-in-time training during the improvement event. We're going to take some time this summer to revise/improve our program so I appreciate everyone's comments on this topic!
--Sue K.
 


posted by  rob  [ http://learnsigma.com ] 18 March 2008 at 8:54 AM ET
I think that you need to understand learning styles first. Personally, I like to learn the theory before I go and do. That's just the way I learn. It allows me to understand the why before the how. Others are happy just to go and do first. No one method suits all personnel and a mix of blend is needed in any training situation.
 


posted by  Sue Kozlowski 20 March 2008 at 3:30 PM ET
Rob, your comment is very perceptive. We've had this feedback from our classes. Some say, THANKS for teaching it to me before I had to do it. Others say, THANKS for letting me do the project first and then giving me all the background information.

In an ideal world, everyone could choose their best learning solution for their own learning preferences!
 

ADD COMMENT
(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
 
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote emoticon smiles
 
comment (*) :

max characters : 2100

characters remaining :
remember me :