6 January 2009 by James Considine
|
Printable version | Email to a friend | ||||||||||||
Don't Look Now - Here Comes the Wave |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
While scanning news for lean and six sigma related articles this morning, I came across this gem: "Six Sigma Certification Booms as Employment Busts" - it was actually a press release posing as news over on msnbc.com. That's fine - I recall from my days in media relations that many news outlets craved pre-written content, especially now with the thinning of news gathering organizations. Over the last few years, the business of Lean Six Sigma certification has bloomed trememdously - a phenomenon that has been discussed at length over on the forums. The consensus there seems to be that such cert programs in and of themselves are fine - I myself have gone through one such program, and had a fine experience with it. For some, online learning works as well, if not better, than classroom training. Different people learn differently. I've also had the opportunity to go through classroom training given at one of the most famous companies ever to use Six Sigma. Again, a fine experience. So what's the harm in presenting Lean Six Sigma certification programs as a way for currently unemployed workers to get a leg up in a tough job market? Or any job market for that matter? As most (if not all) experienced practitioners of Lean and Six Sigma have learned, there is a huge difference between learning the tools and concepts of Lean and Six Sigma and actually applying them in a real business setting, with real people, real (usually messy) data, solving real business problems. In my own experience, running a correct MSA, ANOVA or DOE is far less challenging than working through the politics and organizational challenges to create sustained improvements. And this is not something that one can really learn in the classroom or through an online course. It has to be experienced first hand. In this way, our field is no different than any other. The theory is important to know, but in the end, it's the practical outcome that matters most. Worse yet, the change management approaches used in one company culture may not work in another, or even different cultures within a company. It's a process of continuous learning, re-learning, and adjustment to bring about the desired business impacts. The certification question is not an issue unique to our field. Professional certification programs are widely available - the real question is, does the certificate provide the leg up during job searches? I would be very interested in seeing data on that question. The bottom line: Is getting certified in Lean, Six Sigma, or anything else one of those critical X's for the millions of unemployed right now? Please post your thoughts in the comments section.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Methodology | |||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| posted by James Considine at 6:40 AM ET | comments [9] | |||||||||||||
|
|
| posted by michael cardus [ http://teambuildingwny.blogspot.com ] | 6 January 2009 at 7:56 AM ET |
I have also been reading about 6 Sigma trainings for the unemployment boom, especially here in Western New York. This does concern me - the point you made about the classroom vs. the work floor does create concer. My worry is this - if we have a overflowing market of Lean 6 Sigma specialist this is going to create a market approach where the certification will not mean very much for the people who have the practical experience. Unlike physicians or other highly trained as well as need for increased application of theory with hand on experience. Employers will begin to see 6 Sigma as a bidding process of the employee who is "certified" by someone? will take the lowest bid. Is 6 Simga becoming the "Fish Philosphy"? :) |
|
| posted by Mark Graban [ http://www.leanblog.org ] | 6 January 2009 at 8:42 AM ET |
I've said it many times before -- when looking at a job posting, the more "certifications" that a company wants for Lean, the less likely they are to be a truly Lean company (or one interested in more than superficial Lean tools). For example, if a hospital or company wants a certified Lean person who also has DFSS.... they're just playing the "more certification is more better" game and a true Lean person should probably keep looking. Mark Graban Author, Lean Hospitals: Improving Quality, Patient Safety, and Employee Satisfaction |
|
| posted by Rob [ http://learnsigma.com ] [ http://learnsigma.com ] | 7 January 2009 at 5:51 AM ET |
I do not believe in Lean certification. Lean is not really a Quality discipline. While Lean is used in many improvement projects and just because Quality touches everything does not mean we should certify everything. Most of the new courses include Lean and Six Sigma together at different levels (Green, Black, Master Black Belt). My Black Belt course certainly did. It's only by practicing lean that you truly learn lean. |
|
