Blogosphere Homepage
iSixSigma Homepage
iSixSigma Live!
iSixSigma Publications

Free Weekly Newsletter


Your Privacy Matters
Newsletter Archives

RSS FeedsRSS Feeds >


BLOGGERS
 
Gary P. Cox [127]  RSS  Gary P. Cox's Biography
Gianna Clark [101]  RSS  Gianna Clark's Biography
Sue Kozlowski [101]  RSS  Sue Kozlowski's Biography
Michael Cyger [86]  RSS  Michael Cyger's Biography
Robin Barnwell [68]  RSS  Robin Barnwell's Biography
Andrew Downard [42]  RSS  Andrew Downard's Biography
Stephen C. Crate [30]  RSS  Stephen C. Crate's Biography
Holly Hawkins [24]  RSS  Holly Hawkins's Biography
Kosta Chingas [23]  RSS  Kosta Chingas's Biography
Laura Gibbons [15]  RSS  Laura Gibbons's Biography
Charles McKinney [14]  RSS  Charles McKinney's Biography
J P Spencer [13]  RSS  J P Spencer's Biography
Jessica Harper [13]  RSS  Jessica Harper's Biography
James Considine [13]  RSS  James Considine's Biography
Vincent Chin [11]  RSS  Vincent Chin's Biography


CATEGORIES
 
Book Review [5]  RSS
Buzz/Press [78]  RSS
Conferences [89]  RSS
General [351]  RSS
Government [24]  RSS
Guest Blog [12]  RSS
History [12]  RSS
Innovation [26]  RSS
Leadership [174]  RSS
Lean [52]  RSS
Management [187]  RSS
Methodology [170]  RSS
Military [10]  RSS
Podcasts [9]  RSS
Research [32]  RSS
The Cox-Box [127]  RSS


RECENT ENTRIES RSS
 
A Spoonful of Sugar by Sue Kozlowski
Scope Creep by Gary P. Cox
The Psychology of Awards by Jessica Harper


TWITTER
 


 
LATEST COMMENTS
 
A Spoonful of Sugar
by : thanastump
A Spoonful of Sugar
by : Steven Wieneke
7th Apr '06 v1.21.35a(iii)
by : abercrombiefitch
 


CTQ MEDIA BLOGS
 
Sourcingmag Blogosphere

BPM Enterprise Blogosphere

RealInnovation Commentary
 


SIX SIGMA BLOGS
 
MoreSteam Lean Six Sigma Blog

Monte Carlo, Lean Six Sigma & DFSS

The Data Heads

Today's Six Sigma

Lean Six Sigma Academy

Leadership & Business

Keith Bower Podcasts
 


LEAN BLOGS
 
Lean Blog

Got Boondoggle?

Evolving Excellence

Reforming Project Management

Learning About Lean
 


BUSINESS BLOGS
 
shmula

Seth Godin's Blog

Decker Marketing

Guy Kawasaki

Fast Company Now
 


BLOG ARCHIVE RSS
 



RETIRED BLOGGERS
 
Zakir Ahamed

Gary Cone

Brian Costello

Andrew Downard

Capt. Harris

Andrew Hillig

Rick Maher

Michael Marx

W. Michael McBride

Lisa Moore

Sven Saerens
 


6s Projects and Presentations
Immediately purchase and download Six Sigma project examples, research and training tools.
store.isixsigma.com
 

6s Recruiting
We can help you staff your org, in weeks! Call us at 847-919-0922 x8857 to get started.
jobs.isixsigma.com/
 


3 March 2008 by James Considine
Printable version  |  Email to a friend

The iPod Did Not Come From a Focus Group

"Innovation comes from the producer - not from the customer." - W Edwards Deming


In the course of teaching Kano Analysis to green belts and others, I frequently talk about the difficulty in uncovering delighters or excitement needs, as the customer often cannot articulate these at an actionable level. Or in other words, “The iPod didn’t come from a focus group”. (For the real scoop on where it did come from, click here.)


While it may be true that no customers conceived of the iPod, or a host of other innovative inventions, it is no longer true that innovation is the sole purview of producers. Take the iPhone as an example – originally designed to work only on one wireless network, it was only a matter of weeks before a team created a way to unlock the iPhone to work on other networks – clearly a desirable feature for customers which Apple decided not to include.


There is now a variety of websites devoted to various hacks for the iPhone to overcome shortcomings in the original product and software design, or enable entirely new functions. While it’s likely that customers who would be interested in hacking their iPhones represent a small subset of Apple’s customer base, this is a highly innovative group.


Will Apple take advantage of these efforts? After all, what better way to build future releases with killer features than to allow your customers to run wild and create them on their own? Time will tell. It is intriguing that despite being one of the most innovative companies in the world, Apple’s customers can still find ways to better Apple’s products.


Your company probably knows more about what is possible than most of your customers; but the lesson I take away from the Apple example is this: some of our customers know a lot more than we do, and we ignore them at our peril.


The concept of customer innovation is not exactly new – Harvard Business Review published an article on it in 2002 – but it does seem to be garnering more attention these days. But how many firms are still relying on the “tried and true” methods of developing products, or worse, adopting a “we know best” position and internally designing products and services with little to no input from actual customers?


I think Deming said it best in this line: “It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory.”

Save, Share & Recommend This Blog
Digg It Digg It Del.icio.us Del.icio.us Reddit Reddit Google Google

Yahoo! Yahoo

StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
Innovation
posted by James Considine  at  6:00 AM ET | comments [3]


BLOG COMMENT

posted by  Ian Furst  [ http://www.waittimes.blogspot.com ] 3 March 2008 at 6:34 AM ET
In the health care industries I think the coming callenge will be for velocity (good for lean six sigma co's). People (not the providers) are expecting more and better service delievered on time. Accessability. We alrady see some of the changes but I think there's more to come.
 


posted by  Daniel Renner 4 March 2008 at 0:26 AM ET
I think those examples like Apple are quite difficult because we have to keep in mind that the main goal is to make money not innovation. Innovation is required to make money but only up to a point where it creates something outstanding, even if this is just a minor peak above the mainstream. Beside this, marketing is able to place products with few to none outstanding features, so not only innovation to the product makes money, innovation to advertising plays a major role as well if not more than to the product. The example of the I-phone shows simply that the customer demand wasn't met at all in terms of technical features (just check some cellphone forums and you will see a majority of unhappy people but sample size is heavily biased there ;) ) To learn from such stories is the important thing, regardless if we talk about Apple or any other company (in case survival is mandatory)
 


posted by  James Considine 6 March 2008 at 9:45 AM ET
I'd agree that the case I cited is somewhat unique, as would other cases involving intellectual property. The music business (specifically genres that involve sampling from other songs) is another similar case. However, the model still applies to more traditional goods as well.

Take Scion for example - after seeing the customization craze among young drivers (aka "tuners"), Scion now offers such options to buyers, rather than sending them to aftermarket shops to acquire modifications.

Some would say that Apple's chief competitive advantage is innovation - sure, that takes the form of new technology, etc. but when everything they do is boiled down, Apple = innovation.
 

ADD COMMENT
(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
 
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote
 
comment (*) :

max characters : 2100

characters remaining :
remember me :