iSixSigma Homepage
Blogosphere Homepage
iSixSigma Live!
iSixSigma Publications

Free Weekly Newsletter


Your Privacy Matters
Newsletter Archives



BLOGGERS
 
Gary P. Cox [96]  RSS  Gary P. Cox's Biography
Gianna Clark [88]  RSS  Gianna Clark's Biography
Michael Cyger [78]  RSS  Michael Cyger's Biography
Sue Kozlowski [67]  RSS  Sue Kozlowski's Biography
Robin Barnwell [52]  RSS  Robin Barnwell's Biography
Andrew Downard [36]  RSS  Andrew Downard's Biography
Stephen C. Crate [22]  RSS  Stephen C. Crate's Biography
Holly Hawkins [21]  RSS  Holly Hawkins's Biography
Sven Saerens [19]  RSS  Sven Saerens's Biography
Laura Gibbons [14]  RSS  Laura Gibbons's Biography
Charles McKinney [14]  RSS  Charles McKinney's Biography
J P Spencer [13]  RSS  J P Spencer's Biography
Capt. Harris [12]  RSS  Capt. Harris's Biography
Vincent Chin [10]  RSS  Vincent Chin's Biography
James Considine [9]  RSS  James Considine's Biography
Zakir Ahamed [3]  RSS  Zakir Ahamed's Biography


CATEGORIES
 
Book Review [3]  RSS
Buzz/Press [59]  RSS
Conferences [62]  RSS
General [302]  RSS
Government [20]  RSS
Guest Blog [12]  RSS
History [12]  RSS
Innovation [18]  RSS
Leadership [144]  RSS
Lean [25]  RSS
Management [155]  RSS
Methodology [151]  RSS
Podcasts [8]  RSS
Research [20]  RSS
The Cox-Box [95]  RSS


RECENT ENTRIES RSS
 
Cargo Cults by Andrew Downard
The Best Place to Work by Michael Marx
Think by Gary P. Cox
Return to Sender by Robin Barnwell
Educational by Sue Kozlowski


LATEST COMMENTS
 
5S in Translation
by : Charlton
Achieving Lean
by : Luis Gross
 


CTQ MEDIA BLOGS
 
Sourcingmag Blogosphere

BPM Enterprise Blogosphere

RealInnovation Commentary
 


SIX SIGMA BLOGS
 
Today's Six Sigma

Lean Six Sigma Academy

Leadership & Business

Six Sigma for Corporate Real Estate

Keith Bower Podcasts
 


LEAN BLOGS
 
Lean Blog

Got Boondoggle?

Evolving Excellence

Reforming Project Management

Learning About Lean
 


BUSINESS BLOGS
 
shmula

Seth Godin's Blog

Decker Marketing

Guy Kawasaki

Fast Company Now
 


BLOG ARCHIVE RSS
 



RETIRED BLOGGERS
 
Kosta Chingas

Gary Cone

Brian Costello

Andrew Hillig

Rick Maher

Lisa Moore
 


SigmaXL V5.1 Excel Add-In
Six Sigma Statistics & Graphics. Ideal for training. Now compatible with Excel 2007. Free Trial.
www.SigmaXL.com
 
Voice of the Customer
AMS can help you find out what your customers really want!
www.ams-inc.com
 
6s & Small Co's
How one company went from 2 to 201 employees in 3 years, and why they now use 6s. Exclusively in iSixSigma Magazine!
www.isixsigma-magazine.com
 
6s Projects and Presentations
Immediately purchase and download Six Sigma project examples, research and training tools.
store.isixsigma.com
 
6s Recruiting
We can help you staff your org, in weeks! Call us at 847-919-0922 x8857 to get started.
jobs.isixsigma.com/
 

9 October 2007 by Holly Hawkins
Printable version  |  Email to a friend

Why Projects Fail

My last article discussed the importance of verifying the sustainability of project work. Although there are many positives to living in a Six Sigma world, it does have a dark side- failed project audits.

My experience, dependent on my employer at the time, has been that anywhere from 10-50% of projects are not embedded into an organization’s culture at the time of a 12 month audit.

So why do projects fail? I’m sure there are countless articles and statistical analysis performed on this issue, however here are my thoughts…

  • Change in Key Stakeholder Role. A new Project Champion, Process Owner, etc. moves into the role. Unless solid communication has been made, the value of the project can be ignored or unseen. Also, new blood may mean an absence of Six Sigma training, and as a result, the stakeholder may be oblivious as to what his/her responsibilities are in supporting the aftermath of a project implementation.
  • Poor Project Definition/ Scope of Project. I’ve seen people try to save the world on certain projects, rather than breaking problems down into manageable “chunks”. Other projects have had their definition scope change and as a result the expectation of what the project will focus on/ deliver gets mis-communicated among staff, often resulting in a myriad of expectations for results that are often unachievable.
  • Targets are too Ambitious. Again with the comment regarding saving the world. I think sometimes people get pressured into thinking they have to save “x” dollars every time they do a project and truly don’t due their due diligence when estimating the return on a project. If your employer has a set minimum amount of return for a project and you initially think you can’t achieve it, then it might not necessarily be the best Six Sigma project.
  • Project not Linked to Plan. Especially when training new Black and Green Belts, I’ve seen what I call “feel good” projects. The belt feels good because he/she has come up with a good problem to solve. However, if that problem is not linked to a gap existing between the company plan, metrics, mission statement, etc. and the current state, then it may be hard to garner long term support of embedding any long term improvement work (combined with a role change this can be the kiss of death).

One final note- I have never seen a project fail because the wrong statistical tool was used. Although statistics are important, it’s generally people and their behaviors that will make or break the success of a project.

Save, Share & Recommend This Blog
Digg It Digg It Del.icio.us Del.icio.us Reddit Reddit Google Google

Yahoo! Yahoo

StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
Methodology
posted by Holly Hawkins  at  1:01 AM ET | comments [4]


BLOG COMMENT

posted by  Eric Fay 9 October 2007 at 5:35 AM ET
I agree that that project failure is the embarassing soft underside of our work as Six Sigma professionals.

Your observations on why projects fail got me thinking about projects I have seen or been involved in that have failed or have not been as effectively managed as they could have been.

Using your 4 points as a starting point, I would challenge you to drill down at least one level deeper asking "why" (and if necessary using 5 "why's"). Here are some thoughts based on my experience:

Change in key stakeholder role: I led a project where the Project Champion changed not once, but twice...
- why? because the project dragged on over a year
- - why? because the project scope was too broad
- - - why? because this was one of the first projects we did when we launched Six Sigma and we did not know any better

Poor Project Definition/ Scope of Project: I have seen many projects with a scope which is not SMART
- why? the project steering committee does not catch poor project scopes
- - why? because they do not understand what makes a good or bad project
- - - why? they lack adequate training
- - - - why? they should receive regular refresher training

Targets are too Ambitious: In the most egregious cases targets are deliberately inflated...
- why? because GB's and BB's want to do a Six Sigma project
- - why? because there is pressure on them from the CEO to do a project
- - - why? because without CEO pressure they would not initiate projects
- - - - why? because GB and BB candidates were too busy with other work
- - - - - why? because their bosses did not make use of their Six Sigma skills

Project not Linked to Plan: I frequently saw projects that were too internally focused...
- why: the GB or BB was not aware of the big "Y"
- - why: because the boss did not communicate it too him/her
- - - why: because he did not know it or understand it either

Conclusion: there are fundamental root causes at the heart of all these problems: communication, training, oversight.
 


posted by  Ramnath. D 21 October 2007 at 12:21 PM ET


I would like to add one more situation where a project might fail for the usage of Statistical tools.
In a way, I am trying to find a solution for my problem. I have taken up a process which was not functioning and is forgotten by the respective stakeholders, which is due to handover problems.

After 1 Year I found this problem and provided an useful solution, which has proved to be one of the source of Revenue Generation.

Now comes the problem.

a) Is Process Re-engineering a Six Sigma Project?

b) If so for Measure and Analysis Phase what is the kind of data you will have to demonstrate the process failure?
This is because the simple fact is you do receive mails from customers but there is no response to it. So i thougth the maximum possible is a discrete data like "Mails Responded and Non-Responded". Since 99.99% are defects the sigma level would be in Minus figure.

Ofcourse in improve and control phases you can show the real improvement and put control measures.

Can I expect someone to provide a solution to the stated problem?
 


posted by  Merry 24 October 2007 at 8:20 AM ET
I have experienced projects failing because of one more reason:

Not involving the sponsor or process owner in the project meetings.

I had always had the process owner's representative who had nil or less powers to do something about the process attend the meetings because the process owner was "too busy". Although I tried to catch up with the process owner and explain the difference it makes with her absence, she did not seem to understand and believed that no change will help in improvement as she has already put in the best efforts possible. Overcoming this mindset of the process owner, which had a great influence on the other stakeholders of the process was an uphill task and ultimately the project had to fail.
 


posted by  srinivas 29 April 2008 at 5:28 AM ET
i had bitter experience of six sigma project failure because the cost saving after the project is less and the expectations on the results were more.

it killed my intrest . now i amtrying finding the root cause for my failure.
 

ADD COMMENT
(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
 
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote emoticon smiles
 
comment (*) :

max characters : 2100

characters remaining :
remember me :